MRI Technologist Pay

Longview vs Seattle: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Longview, WA and Seattle, WA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Longview, WA
$105,037
$50.50/hr
Seattle, WA
$137,022
$65.87/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLongview, WASeattle, WA
Median Salary$105,037$137,022
Hourly Rate$50.50$65.87
Entry Level (P10)$74,686$104,904
25th Percentile$87,505$130,542
75th Percentile$118,002$164,572
Top Earner (P90)$140,059$171,924
Total Employed6460
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Longview ($105,037) and Seattle ($137,022) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.LongviewSeattleMedian Salary$105,037$137,022Entry Level (P10)$74,686$104,904Top Earner (P90)$140,059$171,924US Median $100,283

Verdict

Seattle, WA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Longview.

The salary gap between Longview and Seattle is $31,985 (30.45%). Seattle's median is +36.64% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Longview spans $65,373,Seattle spans $67,020. Seattle has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Longview
P10 (Entry)$74,686
P25$87,505
Median$105,037
P75$118,002
P90 (Top)$140,059
Seattle
P10 (Entry)$104,904
P25$130,542
Median$137,022
P75$164,572
P90 (Top)$171,924

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Seattle ($123,296 effective) pays 26.07% more than Longview ($97,800 effective).

Longview
Nominal: $105,037
CoL Index: 107.4
Adjusted: $97,800
Seattle
Nominal: $137,022
CoL Index: 111.133
Adjusted: $123,296

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Longview if…

  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Choose Seattle if…

  • Higher median salary ($137,022/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($171,924)
  • Larger job market (460 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $123,296)
  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Longview grew -11.6% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 28.2% growth in Seattle over the same period.

Longview, WA

+-11.6%

$113,120 (2024) → $100,007 (2025)

Seattle, WA

+28.2%

$101,780 (2019) → $130,460 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Longview or Seattle?

Seattle has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $137,022/year, compared to Longview at $105,037/year — a difference of $31,985 (30.45%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Longview and Seattle?

Longview magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $50.50/hr while Seattle hygienists earn $65.87/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Longview to Seattle as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Longview and Seattle. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Longview = $97,800, Seattle = $123,296), job availability (6 vs 460 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Longview vs Seattle?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $74,686 in Longview and $104,904 in Seattle. The Seattle area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov