MRI Technologist Pay

Longview vs Spokane: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Longview, WA and Spokane, WA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Longview, WA
$105,037
$50.50/hr
Spokane, WA
$114,021
$54.82/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLongview, WASpokane, WA
Median Salary$105,037$114,021
Hourly Rate$50.50$54.82
Entry Level (P10)$74,686$83,446
25th Percentile$87,505$106,490
75th Percentile$118,002$127,317
Top Earner (P90)$140,059$137,400
Total Employed6120
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Longview ($105,037) and Spokane ($114,021) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.LongviewSpokaneMedian Salary$105,037$114,021Entry Level (P10)$74,686$83,446Top Earner (P90)$140,059$137,400US Median $100,283

Verdict

Spokane, WA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Longview.

The salary gap between Longview and Spokane is $8,984 (8.55%). Spokane's median is +13.70% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Longview spans $65,373,Spokane spans $53,954. Longview has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Longview
P10 (Entry)$74,686
P25$87,505
Median$105,037
P75$118,002
P90 (Top)$140,059
Spokane
P10 (Entry)$83,446
P25$106,490
Median$114,021
P75$127,317
P90 (Top)$137,400

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Spokane ($113,628 effective) pays 16.18% more than Longview ($97,800 effective).

Longview
Nominal: $105,037
CoL Index: 107.4
Adjusted: $97,800
Spokane
Nominal: $114,021
CoL Index: 100.346
Adjusted: $113,628

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Longview if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($140,059)
  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Choose Spokane if…

  • Higher median salary ($114,021/year)
  • Larger job market (120 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $113,628)
  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Longview grew -11.6% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 28.8% growth in Spokane over the same period.

Longview, WA

+-11.6%

$113,120 (2024) → $100,007 (2025)

Spokane, WA

+28.8%

$84,310 (2019) → $108,560 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Longview or Spokane?

Spokane has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $114,021/year, compared to Longview at $105,037/year — a difference of $8,984 (8.55%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Longview and Spokane?

Longview magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $50.50/hr while Spokane hygienists earn $54.82/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Longview to Spokane as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Longview and Spokane. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Longview = $97,800, Spokane = $113,628), job availability (6 vs 120 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Longview vs Spokane?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $74,686 in Longview and $83,446 in Spokane. The Spokane area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov