MRI Technologist Pay

Minneapolis vs Bloomington: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Minneapolis, MN and Bloomington, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Minneapolis, MN
$109,567
$52.67/hr
Bloomington, MN
$107,625
$51.74/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMinneapolis, MNBloomington, MN
Median Salary$109,567$107,625
Hourly Rate$52.67$51.74
Entry Level (P10)$94,926$79,189
25th Percentile$104,536$89,421
75th Percentile$113,180$119,820
Top Earner (P90)$117,445$142,627
Total Employed43018
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Minneapolis ($109,567) and Bloomington ($107,625) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.MinneapolisBloomingtonMedian Salary$109,567$107,625Entry Level (P10)$94,926$79,189Top Earner (P90)$117,445$142,627US Median $100,283

Verdict

Minneapolis, MN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Bloomington.

The salary gap between Minneapolis and Bloomington is $1,942 (1.80%). Minneapolis's median is +9.26% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Minneapolis spans $22,519,Bloomington spans $63,438. Bloomington has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Minneapolis
P10 (Entry)$94,926
P25$104,536
Median$109,567
P75$113,180
P90 (Top)$117,445
Bloomington
P10 (Entry)$79,189
P25$89,421
Median$107,625
P75$119,820
P90 (Top)$142,627

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Bloomington ($109,264 effective) pays 4.53% more than Minneapolis ($104,527 effective).

Minneapolis
Nominal: $109,567
CoL Index: 104.822
Adjusted: $104,527
Bloomington
Nominal: $107,625
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $109,264

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Minneapolis if…

  • Higher median salary ($109,567/year)
  • Larger job market (430 employed)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose Bloomington if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($142,627)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $109,264)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Minneapolis grew 27.4% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 21.6% growth in Bloomington over the same period.

Minneapolis, MN

+27.4%

$81,860 (2019) → $104,320 (2025)

Bloomington, MN

+21.6%

$84,293 (2024) → $102,471 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Minneapolis or Bloomington?

Minneapolis has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $109,567/year, compared to Bloomington at $107,625/year — a difference of $1,942 (1.80%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Minneapolis and Bloomington?

Minneapolis magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $52.67/hr while Bloomington hygienists earn $51.74/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Minneapolis to Bloomington as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Minneapolis and Bloomington. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Minneapolis = $104,527, Bloomington = $109,264), job availability (430 vs 18 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Minneapolis vs Bloomington?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $94,926 in Minneapolis and $79,189 in Bloomington. The Minneapolis area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov