MRI Technologist Pay

Minneapolis vs Rochester: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Minneapolis, MN and Rochester, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Minneapolis, MN
$109,567
$52.67/hr
Rochester, MN
$105,975
$50.95/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMinneapolis, MNRochester, MN
Median Salary$109,567$105,975
Hourly Rate$52.67$50.95
Entry Level (P10)$94,926$88,519
25th Percentile$104,536$105,975
75th Percentile$113,180$105,975
Top Earner (P90)$117,445$121,845
Total Employed43050
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Minneapolis ($109,567) and Rochester ($105,975) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.MinneapolisRochesterMedian Salary$109,567$105,975Entry Level (P10)$94,926$88,519Top Earner (P90)$117,445$121,845US Median $100,283

Verdict

Minneapolis, MN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Rochester.

The salary gap between Minneapolis and Rochester is $3,592 (3.39%). Minneapolis's median is +9.26% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Minneapolis spans $22,519,Rochester spans $33,326. Rochester has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Minneapolis
P10 (Entry)$94,926
P25$104,536
Median$109,567
P75$113,180
P90 (Top)$117,445
Rochester
P10 (Entry)$88,519
P25$105,975
Median$105,975
P75$105,975
P90 (Top)$121,845

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Rochester ($116,686 effective) pays 11.63% more than Minneapolis ($104,527 effective).

Minneapolis
Nominal: $109,567
CoL Index: 104.822
Adjusted: $104,527
Rochester
Nominal: $105,975
CoL Index: 90.821
Adjusted: $116,686

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Minneapolis if…

  • Higher median salary ($109,567/year)
  • Larger job market (430 employed)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose Rochester if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($121,845)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $116,686)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Minneapolis grew 27.4% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 15.6% growth in Rochester over the same period.

Minneapolis, MN

+27.4%

$81,860 (2019) → $104,320 (2025)

Rochester, MN

+15.6%

$87,256 (2024) → $100,900 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Minneapolis or Rochester?

Minneapolis has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $109,567/year, compared to Rochester at $105,975/year — a difference of $3,592 (3.39%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Minneapolis and Rochester?

Minneapolis magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $52.67/hr while Rochester hygienists earn $50.95/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Minneapolis to Rochester as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Minneapolis and Rochester. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Minneapolis = $104,527, Rochester = $116,686), job availability (430 vs 50 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Minneapolis vs Rochester?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $94,926 in Minneapolis and $88,519 in Rochester. The Minneapolis area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov