MRI Technologist Pay

Salt Lake City vs Spanish Fork: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Salt Lake City, UT and Spanish Fork, UT. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Salt Lake City, UT
$95,735
$46.02/hr
Spanish Fork, UT
$97,407
$46.83/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSalt Lake City, UTSpanish Fork, UT
Median Salary$95,735$97,407
Hourly Rate$46.02$46.83
Entry Level (P10)$88,404$72,139
25th Percentile$91,607$86,740
75th Percentile$111,342$105,442
Top Earner (P90)$114,682$123,339
Total Employed1509
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Salt Lake City ($95,735) and Spanish Fork ($97,407) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Salt Lake CitySpanish ForkMedian Salary$95,735$97,407Entry Level (P10)$88,404$72,139Top Earner (P90)$114,682$123,339US Median $100,283

Verdict

Spanish Fork, UT offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Salt Lake City.

The salary gap between Salt Lake City and Spanish Fork is $1,672 (1.75%). Spanish Fork's median is -2.87% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Salt Lake City spans $26,278,Spanish Fork spans $51,200. Spanish Fork has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Salt Lake City
P10 (Entry)$88,404
P25$91,607
Median$95,735
P75$111,342
P90 (Top)$114,682
Spanish Fork
P10 (Entry)$72,139
P25$86,740
Median$97,407
P75$105,442
P90 (Top)$123,339

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Spanish Fork ($99,294 effective) pays 4.62% more than Salt Lake City ($94,911 effective).

Salt Lake City
Nominal: $95,735
CoL Index: 100.868
Adjusted: $94,911
Spanish Fork
Nominal: $97,407
CoL Index: 98.1
Adjusted: $99,294

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Salt Lake City if…

  • Larger job market (150 employed)
  • You prefer the Utah area and lifestyle

Choose Spanish Fork if…

  • Higher median salary ($97,407/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($123,339)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $99,294)
  • You prefer the Utah area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Salt Lake City grew 44.5% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 22.4% growth in Spanish Fork over the same period.

Salt Lake City, UT

+44.5%

$63,090 (2019) → $91,150 (2025)

Spanish Fork, UT

+22.4%

$75,763 (2024) → $92,742 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Salt Lake City or Spanish Fork?

Spanish Fork has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $97,407/year, compared to Salt Lake City at $95,735/year — a difference of $1,672 (1.75%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Salt Lake City and Spanish Fork?

Salt Lake City magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $46.02/hr while Spanish Fork hygienists earn $46.83/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Salt Lake City to Spanish Fork as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Salt Lake City and Spanish Fork. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Salt Lake City = $94,911, Spanish Fork = $99,294), job availability (150 vs 9 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Salt Lake City vs Spanish Fork?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $88,404 in Salt Lake City and $72,139 in Spanish Fork. The Salt Lake City area offers higher starting salaries.
CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov