MRI Technologist Pay

Eagan vs Minneapolis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Eagan, MN and Minneapolis, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Eagan, MN
$96,817
$46.55/hr
Minneapolis, MN
$109,567
$52.67/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEagan, MNMinneapolis, MN
Median Salary$96,817$109,567
Hourly Rate$46.55$52.67
Entry Level (P10)$72,538$94,926
25th Percentile$83,462$104,536
75th Percentile$108,651$113,180
Top Earner (P90)$130,115$117,445
Total Employed13430
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Eagan ($96,817) and Minneapolis ($109,567) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.EaganMinneapolisMedian Salary$96,817$109,567Entry Level (P10)$72,538$94,926Top Earner (P90)$130,115$117,445US Median $100,283

Verdict

Minneapolis, MN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Eagan.

The salary gap between Eagan and Minneapolis is $12,750 (13.17%). Minneapolis's median is +9.26% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Eagan spans $57,577,Minneapolis spans $22,519. Eagan has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Eagan
P10 (Entry)$72,538
P25$83,462
Median$96,817
P75$108,651
P90 (Top)$130,115
Minneapolis
P10 (Entry)$94,926
P25$104,536
Median$109,567
P75$113,180
P90 (Top)$117,445

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Minneapolis ($104,527 effective) pays 6.34% more than Eagan ($98,291 effective).

Eagan
Nominal: $96,817
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $98,291
Minneapolis
Nominal: $109,567
CoL Index: 104.822
Adjusted: $104,527

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Eagan if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($130,115)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose Minneapolis if…

  • Higher median salary ($109,567/year)
  • Larger job market (430 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $104,527)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Eagan grew 8.5% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 27.4% growth in Minneapolis over the same period.

Eagan, MN

+8.5%

$84,959 (2024) → $92,180 (2025)

Minneapolis, MN

+27.4%

$81,860 (2019) → $104,320 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Eagan or Minneapolis?

Minneapolis has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $109,567/year, compared to Eagan at $96,817/year — a difference of $12,750 (13.17%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Eagan and Minneapolis?

Eagan magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $46.55/hr while Minneapolis hygienists earn $52.67/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Eagan to Minneapolis as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Eagan and Minneapolis. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Eagan = $98,291, Minneapolis = $104,527), job availability (13 vs 430 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Eagan vs Minneapolis?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $72,538 in Eagan and $94,926 in Minneapolis. The Minneapolis area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov