MRI Technologist Pay

Los Angeles vs Fresno: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Los Angeles, CA and Fresno, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Los Angeles, CA
$115,323
$55.45/hr
Fresno, CA
$112,078
$53.88/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLos Angeles, CAFresno, CA
Median Salary$115,323$112,078
Hourly Rate$55.45$53.88
Entry Level (P10)$67,608$81,577
25th Percentile$89,832$88,698
75th Percentile$142,011$143,723
Top Earner (P90)$167,145$170,516
Total Employed1,290130
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Los Angeles ($115,323) and Fresno ($112,078) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Los AngelesFresnoMedian Salary$115,323$112,078Entry Level (P10)$67,608$81,577Top Earner (P90)$167,145$170,516US Median $100,283

Verdict

Los Angeles, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Fresno.

The salary gap between Los Angeles and Fresno is $3,245 (2.90%). Los Angeles's median is +15.00% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Los Angeles spans $99,537,Fresno spans $88,939. Los Angeles has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Los Angeles
P10 (Entry)$67,608
P25$89,832
Median$115,323
P75$142,011
P90 (Top)$167,145
Fresno
P10 (Entry)$81,577
P25$88,698
Median$112,078
P75$143,723
P90 (Top)$170,516

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Fresno ($109,710 effective) pays 8.04% more than Los Angeles ($101,547 effective).

Los Angeles
Nominal: $115,323
CoL Index: 113.566
Adjusted: $101,547
Fresno
Nominal: $112,078
CoL Index: 102.158
Adjusted: $109,710

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Los Angeles if…

  • Higher median salary ($115,323/year)
  • Larger job market (1,290 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Fresno if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($170,516)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $109,710)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Los Angeles grew 9.3% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 7.6% growth in Fresno over the same period.

Los Angeles, CA

+9.3%

$100,430 (2019) → $109,800 (2025)

Fresno, CA

+7.6%

$99,140 (2019) → $106,710 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Los Angeles or Fresno?

Los Angeles has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $115,323/year, compared to Fresno at $112,078/year — a difference of $3,245 (2.90%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Los Angeles and Fresno?

Los Angeles magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $55.45/hr while Fresno hygienists earn $53.88/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Los Angeles to Fresno as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Los Angeles and Fresno. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Los Angeles = $101,547, Fresno = $109,710), job availability (1,290 vs 130 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Los Angeles vs Fresno?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $67,608 in Los Angeles and $81,577 in Fresno. The Fresno area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov