Los Angeles vs San Francisco: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)
Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Los Angeles, CA | San Francisco, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Salary | $115,323 | $153,617▲ |
| Hourly Rate | $55.45 | $73.86▲ |
| Entry Level (P10) | $67,608 | $100,388▲ |
| 25th Percentile | $89,832 | $106,500▲ |
| 75th Percentile | $142,011 | $184,968▲ |
| Top Earner (P90) | $167,145 | $191,533▲ |
| Total Employed | 1,290▲ | 420 |
Verdict
San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Los Angeles.
The salary gap between Los Angeles and San Francisco is $38,294 (33.21%). San Francisco's median is +53.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.
Salary Range Comparison
The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Los Angeles spans $99,537,San Francisco spans $91,145. Los Angeles has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.
Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison
After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($132,872 effective) pays 30.85% more than Los Angeles ($101,547 effective).
Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.
Which City Is Right for You?
Choose Los Angeles if…
- ✓Larger job market (1,290 employed)
- ✓You prefer the California area and lifestyle
Choose San Francisco if…
- ✓Higher median salary ($153,617/year)
- ✓Better top-earner potential ($191,533)
- ✓Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $132,872)
- ✓You prefer the California area and lifestyle
Historical Salary Growth Comparison
Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Los Angeles grew 9.3% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 41.6% growth in San Francisco over the same period.
Los Angeles, CA
$100,430 (2019) → $109,800 (2025)
San Francisco, CA
$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)
View Full Salary Data
Los Angeles, CA
San Francisco, CA
Frequently Asked Questions
Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Los Angeles or San Francisco?
What is the hourly rate difference between Los Angeles and San Francisco?
Should I relocate from Los Angeles to San Francisco as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?
What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Los Angeles vs San Francisco?
Related Comparisons
Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)
Career Analyst
Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.
Methodology & Data Source
All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.
Data Sources & Methodology
Source: BLS, OEWS , released .
Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov