MRI Technologist Pay

Los Angeles vs Santa Clara: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Los Angeles, CA and Santa Clara, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Los Angeles, CA
$115,323
$55.45/hr
Santa Clara, CA
$188,966
$90.85/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLos Angeles, CASanta Clara, CA
Median Salary$115,323$188,966
Hourly Rate$55.45$90.85
Entry Level (P10)$67,608$131,901
25th Percentile$89,832$163,199
75th Percentile$142,011$208,843
Top Earner (P90)$167,145$250,064
Total Employed1,29032
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Los Angeles ($115,323) and Santa Clara ($188,966) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.Los AngelesSanta ClaraMedian Salary$115,323$188,966Entry Level (P10)$67,608$131,901Top Earner (P90)$167,145$250,064US Median $100,283

Verdict

Santa Clara, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Los Angeles.

The salary gap between Los Angeles and Santa Clara is $73,643 (63.86%). Santa Clara's median is +88.43% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Los Angeles spans $99,537,Santa Clara spans $118,163. Santa Clara has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Los Angeles
P10 (Entry)$67,608
P25$89,832
Median$115,323
P75$142,011
P90 (Top)$167,145
Santa Clara
P10 (Entry)$131,901
P25$163,199
Median$188,966
P75$208,843
P90 (Top)$250,064

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Santa Clara ($167,079 effective) pays 64.53% more than Los Angeles ($101,547 effective).

Los Angeles
Nominal: $115,323
CoL Index: 113.566
Adjusted: $101,547
Santa Clara
Nominal: $188,966
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $167,079

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Los Angeles if…

  • Larger job market (1,290 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Santa Clara if…

  • Higher median salary ($188,966/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($250,064)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $167,079)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Los Angeles grew 9.3% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 31.3% growth in Santa Clara over the same period.

Los Angeles, CA

+9.3%

$100,430 (2019) → $109,800 (2025)

Santa Clara, CA

+31.3%

$137,052 (2024) → $179,916 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Los Angeles or Santa Clara?

Santa Clara has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $188,966/year, compared to Los Angeles at $115,323/year — a difference of $73,643 (63.86%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Los Angeles and Santa Clara?

Los Angeles magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $55.45/hr while Santa Clara hygienists earn $90.85/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Los Angeles to Santa Clara as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Los Angeles and Santa Clara. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Los Angeles = $101,547, Santa Clara = $167,079), job availability (1,290 vs 32 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Los Angeles vs Santa Clara?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $67,608 in Los Angeles and $131,901 in Santa Clara. The Santa Clara area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov