MRI Technologist Pay

Madera vs San Diego: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Madera, CA and San Diego, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Madera, CA
$126,263
$60.71/hr
San Diego, CA
$129,271
$62.15/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMadera, CASan Diego, CA
Median Salary$126,263$129,271
Hourly Rate$60.71$62.15
Entry Level (P10)$93,904$78,247
25th Percentile$108,325$96,985
75th Percentile$141,369$149,804
Top Earner (P90)$168,498$160,853
Total Employed8320
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Madera ($126,263) and San Diego ($129,271) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.MaderaSan DiegoMedian Salary$126,263$129,271Entry Level (P10)$93,904$78,247Top Earner (P90)$168,498$160,853US Median $100,283

Verdict

San Diego, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Madera.

The salary gap between Madera and San Diego is $3,008 (2.38%). San Diego's median is +28.91% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Madera spans $74,594,San Diego spans $82,606. San Diego has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Madera
P10 (Entry)$93,904
P25$108,325
Median$126,263
P75$141,369
P90 (Top)$168,498
San Diego
P10 (Entry)$78,247
P25$96,985
Median$129,271
P75$149,804
P90 (Top)$160,853

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Diego ($115,537 effective) pays 3.49% more than Madera ($111,638 effective).

Madera
Nominal: $126,263
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $111,638
San Diego
Nominal: $129,271
CoL Index: 111.887
Adjusted: $115,537

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Madera if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($168,498)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Diego if…

  • Higher median salary ($129,271/year)
  • Larger job market (320 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $115,537)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Madera grew -7.8% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 28.1% growth in San Diego over the same period.

Madera, CA

+-7.8%

$130,353 (2024) → $120,216 (2025)

San Diego, CA

+28.1%

$96,100 (2019) → $123,080 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Madera or San Diego?

San Diego has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $129,271/year, compared to Madera at $126,263/year — a difference of $3,008 (2.38%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Madera and San Diego?

Madera magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $60.71/hr while San Diego hygienists earn $62.15/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Madera to San Diego as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Madera and San Diego. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Madera = $111,638, San Diego = $115,537), job availability (8 vs 320 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Madera vs San Diego?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $93,904 in Madera and $78,247 in San Diego. The Madera area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov