MRI Technologist Pay

Minneapolis vs Winona: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Minneapolis, MN and Winona, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Minneapolis, MN
$109,567
$52.67/hr
Winona, MN
$93,611
$45.01/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMinneapolis, MNWinona, MN
Median Salary$109,567$93,611
Hourly Rate$52.67$45.01
Entry Level (P10)$94,926$70,291
25th Percentile$104,536$80,450
75th Percentile$113,180$102,023
Top Earner (P90)$117,445$119,665
Total Employed4304
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Minneapolis ($109,567) and Winona ($93,611) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.MinneapolisWinonaMedian Salary$109,567$93,611Entry Level (P10)$94,926$70,291Top Earner (P90)$117,445$119,665US Median $100,283

Verdict

Minneapolis, MN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Winona.

The salary gap between Minneapolis and Winona is $15,956 (17.05%). Minneapolis's median is +9.26% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Minneapolis spans $22,519,Winona spans $49,374. Winona has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Minneapolis
P10 (Entry)$94,926
P25$104,536
Median$109,567
P75$113,180
P90 (Top)$117,445
Winona
P10 (Entry)$70,291
P25$80,450
Median$93,611
P75$102,023
P90 (Top)$119,665

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Minneapolis ($104,527 effective) pays 9.99% more than Winona ($95,037 effective).

Minneapolis
Nominal: $109,567
CoL Index: 104.822
Adjusted: $104,527
Winona
Nominal: $93,611
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $95,037

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Minneapolis if…

  • Higher median salary ($109,567/year)
  • Larger job market (430 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $104,527)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose Winona if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($119,665)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Minneapolis grew 27.4% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 8.5% growth in Winona over the same period.

Minneapolis, MN

+27.4%

$81,860 (2019) → $104,320 (2025)

Winona, MN

+8.5%

$82,146 (2024) → $89,128 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Minneapolis or Winona?

Minneapolis has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $109,567/year, compared to Winona at $93,611/year — a difference of $15,956 (17.05%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Minneapolis and Winona?

Minneapolis magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $52.67/hr while Winona hygienists earn $45.01/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Minneapolis to Winona as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Minneapolis and Winona. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Minneapolis = $104,527, Winona = $95,037), job availability (430 vs 4 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Minneapolis vs Winona?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $94,926 in Minneapolis and $70,291 in Winona. The Minneapolis area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov