MRI Technologist Pay

Moorhead vs Rochester: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Moorhead, MN and Rochester, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Moorhead, MN
$94,999
$45.68/hr
Rochester, MN
$105,975
$50.95/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMoorhead, MNRochester, MN
Median Salary$94,999$105,975
Hourly Rate$45.68$50.95
Entry Level (P10)$73,602$88,519
25th Percentile$83,318$105,975
75th Percentile$101,739$105,975
Top Earner (P90)$127,233$121,845
Total Employed1150
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Moorhead ($94,999) and Rochester ($105,975) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.MoorheadRochesterMedian Salary$94,999$105,975Entry Level (P10)$73,602$88,519Top Earner (P90)$127,233$121,845US Median $100,283

Verdict

Rochester, MN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Moorhead.

The salary gap between Moorhead and Rochester is $10,976 (11.55%). Rochester's median is +5.68% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Moorhead spans $53,631,Rochester spans $33,326. Moorhead has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Moorhead
P10 (Entry)$73,602
P25$83,318
Median$94,999
P75$101,739
P90 (Top)$127,233
Rochester
P10 (Entry)$88,519
P25$105,975
Median$105,975
P75$105,975
P90 (Top)$121,845

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Rochester ($116,686 effective) pays 20.99% more than Moorhead ($96,446 effective).

Moorhead
Nominal: $94,999
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $96,446
Rochester
Nominal: $105,975
CoL Index: 90.821
Adjusted: $116,686

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Moorhead if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($127,233)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose Rochester if…

  • Higher median salary ($105,975/year)
  • Larger job market (50 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $116,686)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Moorhead grew 8.5% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 15.6% growth in Rochester over the same period.

Moorhead, MN

+8.5%

$83,363 (2024) → $90,449 (2025)

Rochester, MN

+15.6%

$87,256 (2024) → $100,900 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Moorhead or Rochester?

Rochester has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $105,975/year, compared to Moorhead at $94,999/year — a difference of $10,976 (11.55%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Moorhead and Rochester?

Moorhead magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $45.68/hr while Rochester hygienists earn $50.95/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Moorhead to Rochester as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Moorhead and Rochester. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Moorhead = $96,446, Rochester = $116,686), job availability (11 vs 50 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Moorhead vs Rochester?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73,602 in Moorhead and $88,519 in Rochester. The Rochester area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov