MRI Technologist Pay

Phoenix vs Glendale: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Phoenix, AZ and Glendale, AZ. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Phoenix, AZ
$102,866
$49.46/hr
Glendale, AZ
$103,732
$49.87/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPhoenix, AZGlendale, AZ
Median Salary$102,866$103,732
Hourly Rate$49.46$49.87
Entry Level (P10)$85,536$70,375
25th Percentile$87,395$84,780
75th Percentile$111,920$116,675
Top Earner (P90)$130,615$141,919
Total Employed58050
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Phoenix ($102,866) and Glendale ($103,732) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.PhoenixGlendaleMedian Salary$102,866$103,732Entry Level (P10)$85,536$70,375Top Earner (P90)$130,615$141,919US Median $100,283

Verdict

Glendale, AZ offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Phoenix.

The salary gap between Phoenix and Glendale is $866 (0.84%). Glendale's median is +3.44% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Phoenix spans $45,079,Glendale spans $71,544. Glendale has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Phoenix
P10 (Entry)$85,536
P25$87,395
Median$102,866
P75$111,920
P90 (Top)$130,615
Glendale
P10 (Entry)$70,375
P25$84,780
Median$103,732
P75$116,675
P90 (Top)$141,919

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Glendale ($105,312 effective) pays 5.77% more than Phoenix ($99,564 effective).

Phoenix
Nominal: $102,866
CoL Index: 103.316
Adjusted: $99,564
Glendale
Nominal: $103,732
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $105,312

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Phoenix if…

  • Larger job market (580 employed)
  • You prefer the Arizona area and lifestyle

Choose Glendale if…

  • Higher median salary ($103,732/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($141,919)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $105,312)
  • You prefer the Arizona area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Phoenix grew 17.8% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 11.0% growth in Glendale over the same period.

Phoenix, AZ

+17.8%

$83,120 (2019) → $97,940 (2025)

Glendale, AZ

+11.0%

$88,958 (2024) → $98,764 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Phoenix or Glendale?

Glendale has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $103,732/year, compared to Phoenix at $102,866/year — a difference of $866 (0.84%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Phoenix and Glendale?

Phoenix magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $49.46/hr while Glendale hygienists earn $49.87/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Phoenix to Glendale as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Phoenix and Glendale. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Phoenix = $99,564, Glendale = $105,312), job availability (580 vs 50 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Phoenix vs Glendale?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $85,536 in Phoenix and $70,375 in Glendale. The Phoenix area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov