MRI Technologist Pay

Richfield vs St. Paul: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Richfield, MN and St. Paul, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Richfield, MN
$95,145
$45.74/hr
St. Paul, MN
$108,468
$52.15/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRichfield, MNSt. Paul, MN
Median Salary$95,145$108,468
Hourly Rate$45.74$52.15
Entry Level (P10)$73,553$76,961
25th Percentile$83,622$91,242
75th Percentile$101,922$120,486
Top Earner (P90)$124,579$157,199
Total Employed980
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Richfield ($95,145) and St. Paul ($108,468) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.RichfieldSt. PaulMedian Salary$95,145$108,468Entry Level (P10)$73,553$76,961Top Earner (P90)$124,579$157,199US Median $100,283

Verdict

St. Paul, MN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Richfield.

The salary gap between Richfield and St. Paul is $13,323 (14.00%). St. Paul's median is +8.16% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Richfield spans $51,026,St. Paul spans $80,238. St. Paul has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Richfield
P10 (Entry)$73,553
P25$83,622
Median$95,145
P75$101,922
P90 (Top)$124,579
St. Paul
P10 (Entry)$76,961
P25$91,242
Median$108,468
P75$120,486
P90 (Top)$157,199

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, St. Paul ($110,120 effective) pays 14.00% more than Richfield ($96,594 effective).

Richfield
Nominal: $95,145
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $96,594
St. Paul
Nominal: $108,468
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $110,120

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Richfield if…

  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose St. Paul if…

  • Higher median salary ($108,468/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($157,199)
  • Larger job market (80 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $110,120)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Richfield grew 8.5% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 14.6% growth in St. Paul over the same period.

Richfield, MN

+8.5%

$83,491 (2024) → $90,588 (2025)

St. Paul, MN

+14.6%

$90,100 (2024) → $103,273 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Richfield or St. Paul?

St. Paul has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $108,468/year, compared to Richfield at $95,145/year — a difference of $13,323 (14.00%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Richfield and St. Paul?

Richfield magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $45.74/hr while St. Paul hygienists earn $52.15/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Richfield to St. Paul as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Richfield and St. Paul. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Richfield = $96,594, St. Paul = $110,120), job availability (9 vs 80 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Richfield vs St. Paul?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73,553 in Richfield and $76,961 in St. Paul. The St. Paul area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov