MRI Technologist Pay

Rochester vs St. Louis Park: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Rochester, MN and St. Louis Park, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Rochester, MN
$105,975
$50.95/hr
St. Louis Park, MN
$95,137
$45.74/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRochester, MNSt. Louis Park, MN
Median Salary$105,975$95,137
Hourly Rate$50.95$45.74
Entry Level (P10)$88,519$71,073
25th Percentile$105,975$81,492
75th Percentile$105,975$105,476
Top Earner (P90)$121,845$124,554
Total Employed509
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Rochester ($105,975) and St. Louis Park ($95,137) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.RochesterSt. Louis ParkMedian Salary$105,975$95,137Entry Level (P10)$88,519$71,073Top Earner (P90)$121,845$124,554US Median $100,283

Verdict

Rochester, MN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to St. Louis Park.

The salary gap between Rochester and St. Louis Park is $10,838 (11.39%). Rochester's median is +5.68% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Rochester spans $33,326,St. Louis Park spans $53,481. St. Louis Park has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Rochester
P10 (Entry)$88,519
P25$105,975
Median$105,975
P75$105,975
P90 (Top)$121,845
St. Louis Park
P10 (Entry)$71,073
P25$81,492
Median$95,137
P75$105,476
P90 (Top)$124,554

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Rochester ($116,686 effective) pays 20.81% more than St. Louis Park ($96,586 effective).

Rochester
Nominal: $105,975
CoL Index: 90.821
Adjusted: $116,686
St. Louis Park
Nominal: $95,137
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $96,586

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Rochester if…

  • Higher median salary ($105,975/year)
  • Larger job market (50 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $116,686)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose St. Louis Park if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($124,554)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Rochester grew 15.6% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 8.5% growth in St. Louis Park over the same period.

Rochester, MN

+15.6%

$87,256 (2024) → $100,900 (2025)

St. Louis Park, MN

+8.5%

$83,484 (2024) → $90,581 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Rochester or St. Louis Park?

Rochester has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $105,975/year, compared to St. Louis Park at $95,137/year — a difference of $10,838 (11.39%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Rochester and St. Louis Park?

Rochester magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $50.95/hr while St. Louis Park hygienists earn $45.74/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Rochester to St. Louis Park as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Rochester and St. Louis Park. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Rochester = $116,686, St. Louis Park = $96,586), job availability (50 vs 9 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Rochester vs St. Louis Park?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $88,519 in Rochester and $71,073 in St. Louis Park. The Rochester area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov