MRI Technologist Pay

San Francisco vs Sacramento: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and Sacramento, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$153,617
$73.86/hr
Sacramento, CA
$152,094
$73.12/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASacramento, CA
Median Salary$153,617$152,094
Hourly Rate$73.86$73.12
Entry Level (P10)$100,388$89,885
25th Percentile$106,500$110,628
75th Percentile$184,968$181,796
Top Earner (P90)$191,533$183,172
Total Employed420220
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($153,617) and Sacramento ($152,094) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.San FranciscoSacramentoMedian Salary$153,617$152,094Entry Level (P10)$100,388$89,885Top Earner (P90)$191,533$183,172US Median $100,283

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Sacramento.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Sacramento is $1,523 (1.00%). San Francisco's median is +53.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,145,Sacramento spans $93,287. Sacramento has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$100,388
P25$106,500
Median$153,617
P75$184,968
P90 (Top)$191,533
Sacramento
P10 (Entry)$89,885
P25$110,628
Median$152,094
P75$181,796
P90 (Top)$183,172

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Sacramento ($142,584 effective) pays 7.31% more than San Francisco ($132,872 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $153,617
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $132,872
Sacramento
Nominal: $152,094
CoL Index: 106.67
Adjusted: $142,584

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($153,617/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($191,533)
  • Larger job market (420 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Sacramento if…

  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $142,584)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 41.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 44.8% growth in Sacramento over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+41.6%

$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)

Sacramento, CA

+44.8%

$100,030 (2019) → $144,810 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: San Francisco or Sacramento?

San Francisco has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $153,617/year, compared to Sacramento at $152,094/year — a difference of $1,523 (1.00%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Sacramento?

San Francisco magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73.86/hr while Sacramento hygienists earn $73.12/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Sacramento as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Sacramento. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $132,872, Sacramento = $142,584), job availability (420 vs 220 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in San Francisco vs Sacramento?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $100,388 in San Francisco and $89,885 in Sacramento. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov