MRI Technologist Pay

San Francisco vs San Diego: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and San Diego, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$153,617
$73.86/hr
San Diego, CA
$129,271
$62.15/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASan Diego, CA
Median Salary$153,617$129,271
Hourly Rate$73.86$62.15
Entry Level (P10)$100,388$78,247
25th Percentile$106,500$96,985
75th Percentile$184,968$149,804
Top Earner (P90)$191,533$160,853
Total Employed420320
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($153,617) and San Diego ($129,271) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.San FranciscoSan DiegoMedian Salary$153,617$129,271Entry Level (P10)$100,388$78,247Top Earner (P90)$191,533$160,853US Median $100,283

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to San Diego.

The salary gap between San Francisco and San Diego is $24,346 (18.83%). San Francisco's median is +53.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,145,San Diego spans $82,606. San Francisco has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$100,388
P25$106,500
Median$153,617
P75$184,968
P90 (Top)$191,533
San Diego
P10 (Entry)$78,247
P25$96,985
Median$129,271
P75$149,804
P90 (Top)$160,853

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($132,872 effective) pays 15.00% more than San Diego ($115,537 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $153,617
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $132,872
San Diego
Nominal: $129,271
CoL Index: 111.887
Adjusted: $115,537

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($153,617/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($191,533)
  • Larger job market (420 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $132,872)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Diego if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 41.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 28.1% growth in San Diego over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+41.6%

$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)

San Diego, CA

+28.1%

$96,100 (2019) → $123,080 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: San Francisco or San Diego?

San Francisco has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $153,617/year, compared to San Diego at $129,271/year — a difference of $24,346 (18.83%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and San Diego?

San Francisco magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73.86/hr while San Diego hygienists earn $62.15/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to San Diego as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and San Diego. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $132,872, San Diego = $115,537), job availability (420 vs 320 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in San Francisco vs San Diego?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $100,388 in San Francisco and $78,247 in San Diego. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov