MRI Technologist Pay

San Francisco vs San Jose: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and San Jose, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$153,617
$73.86/hr
San Jose, CA
$185,851
$89.35/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASan Jose, CA
Median Salary$153,617$185,851
Hourly Rate$73.86$89.35
Entry Level (P10)$100,388$109,011
25th Percentile$106,500$137,642
75th Percentile$184,968$185,851
Top Earner (P90)$191,533$188,760
Total Employed420220
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($153,617) and San Jose ($185,851) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.San FranciscoSan JoseMedian Salary$153,617$185,851Entry Level (P10)$100,388$109,011Top Earner (P90)$191,533$188,760US Median $100,283

Verdict

San Francisco and San Jose are closely matched on overall magnetic resonance imaging technologist compensation, each winning on different metrics.

The salary gap between San Francisco and San Jose is $32,234 (20.98%). San Jose's median is +85.33% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,145,San Jose spans $79,749. San Francisco has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$100,388
P25$106,500
Median$153,617
P75$184,968
P90 (Top)$191,533
San Jose
P10 (Entry)$109,011
P25$137,642
Median$185,851
P75$185,851
P90 (Top)$188,760

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Jose ($168,308 effective) pays 26.67% more than San Francisco ($132,872 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $153,617
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $132,872
San Jose
Nominal: $185,851
CoL Index: 110.423
Adjusted: $168,308

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($191,533)
  • Larger job market (420 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Jose if…

  • Higher median salary ($185,851/year)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $168,308)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 41.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 83.4% growth in San Jose over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+41.6%

$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)

San Jose, CA

+83.4%

$96,470 (2019) → $176,950 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: San Francisco or San Jose?

San Jose has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $185,851/year, compared to San Francisco at $153,617/year — a difference of $32,234 (20.98%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and San Jose?

San Francisco magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73.86/hr while San Jose hygienists earn $89.35/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to San Jose as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and San Jose. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $132,872, San Jose = $168,308), job availability (420 vs 220 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in San Francisco vs San Jose?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $100,388 in San Francisco and $109,011 in San Jose. The San Jose area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov