MRI Technologist Pay

San Francisco vs Santa Clarita: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and Santa Clarita, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$153,617
$73.86/hr
Santa Clarita, CA
$132,078
$63.50/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASanta Clarita, CA
Median Salary$153,617$132,078
Hourly Rate$73.86$63.50
Entry Level (P10)$100,388$94,115
25th Percentile$106,500$111,413
75th Percentile$184,968$152,196
Top Earner (P90)$191,533$186,913
Total Employed42041
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($153,617) and Santa Clarita ($132,078) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.San FranciscoSanta ClaritaMedian Salary$153,617$132,078Entry Level (P10)$100,388$94,115Top Earner (P90)$191,533$186,913US Median $100,283

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Santa Clarita.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Santa Clarita is $21,539 (16.31%). San Francisco's median is +53.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,145,Santa Clarita spans $92,798. Santa Clarita has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$100,388
P25$106,500
Median$153,617
P75$184,968
P90 (Top)$191,533
Santa Clarita
P10 (Entry)$94,115
P25$111,413
Median$132,078
P75$152,196
P90 (Top)$186,913

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($132,872 effective) pays 13.78% more than Santa Clarita ($116,780 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $153,617
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $132,872
Santa Clarita
Nominal: $132,078
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $116,780

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($153,617/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($191,533)
  • Larger job market (420 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $132,872)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Santa Clarita if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 41.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -7.8% growth in Santa Clarita over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+41.6%

$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)

Santa Clarita, CA

+-7.8%

$136,357 (2024) → $125,753 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: San Francisco or Santa Clarita?

San Francisco has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $153,617/year, compared to Santa Clarita at $132,078/year — a difference of $21,539 (16.31%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Santa Clarita?

San Francisco magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73.86/hr while Santa Clarita hygienists earn $63.50/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Santa Clarita as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Santa Clarita. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $132,872, Santa Clarita = $116,780), job availability (420 vs 41 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in San Francisco vs Santa Clarita?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $100,388 in San Francisco and $94,115 in Santa Clarita. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov