MRI Technologist Pay

San Francisco vs Santa Maria: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and Santa Maria, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$153,617
$73.86/hr
Santa Maria, CA
$131,981
$63.46/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASanta Maria, CA
Median Salary$153,617$131,981
Hourly Rate$73.86$63.46
Entry Level (P10)$100,388$96,397
25th Percentile$106,500$104,274
75th Percentile$184,968$147,924
Top Earner (P90)$191,533$159,331
Total Employed42030
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($153,617) and Santa Maria ($131,981) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.San FranciscoSanta MariaMedian Salary$153,617$131,981Entry Level (P10)$100,388$96,397Top Earner (P90)$191,533$159,331US Median $100,283

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Santa Maria.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Santa Maria is $21,636 (16.39%). San Francisco's median is +53.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,145,Santa Maria spans $62,934. San Francisco has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$100,388
P25$106,500
Median$153,617
P75$184,968
P90 (Top)$191,533
Santa Maria
P10 (Entry)$96,397
P25$104,274
Median$131,981
P75$147,924
P90 (Top)$159,331

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($132,872 effective) pays 9.53% more than Santa Maria ($121,308 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $153,617
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $132,872
Santa Maria
Nominal: $131,981
CoL Index: 108.798
Adjusted: $121,308

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($153,617/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($191,533)
  • Larger job market (420 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $132,872)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Santa Maria if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 41.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -5.9% growth in Santa Maria over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+41.6%

$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)

Santa Maria, CA

+-5.9%

$133,472 (2024) → $125,660 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: San Francisco or Santa Maria?

San Francisco has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $153,617/year, compared to Santa Maria at $131,981/year — a difference of $21,636 (16.39%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Santa Maria?

San Francisco magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73.86/hr while Santa Maria hygienists earn $63.46/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Santa Maria as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Santa Maria. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $132,872, Santa Maria = $121,308), job availability (420 vs 30 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in San Francisco vs Santa Maria?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $100,388 in San Francisco and $96,397 in Santa Maria. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov