MRI Technologist Pay

San Francisco vs Santa Rosa: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and Santa Rosa, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$153,617
$73.86/hr
Santa Rosa, CA
$127,519
$61.31/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASanta Rosa, CA
Median Salary$153,617$127,519
Hourly Rate$73.86$61.31
Entry Level (P10)$100,388$90,995
25th Percentile$106,500$106,822
75th Percentile$184,968$145,285
Top Earner (P90)$191,533$176,074
Total Employed42044
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($153,617) and Santa Rosa ($127,519) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.San FranciscoSanta RosaMedian Salary$153,617$127,519Entry Level (P10)$100,388$90,995Top Earner (P90)$191,533$176,074US Median $100,283

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Santa Rosa.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Santa Rosa is $26,098 (20.47%). San Francisco's median is +53.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,145,Santa Rosa spans $85,079. San Francisco has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$100,388
P25$106,500
Median$153,617
P75$184,968
P90 (Top)$191,533
Santa Rosa
P10 (Entry)$90,995
P25$106,822
Median$127,519
P75$145,285
P90 (Top)$176,074

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($132,872 effective) pays 17.85% more than Santa Rosa ($112,749 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $153,617
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $132,872
Santa Rosa
Nominal: $127,519
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $112,749

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($153,617/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($191,533)
  • Larger job market (420 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $132,872)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Santa Rosa if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 41.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 22.7% growth in Santa Rosa over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+41.6%

$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)

Santa Rosa, CA

+22.7%

$98,980 (2020) → $121,412 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: San Francisco or Santa Rosa?

San Francisco has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $153,617/year, compared to Santa Rosa at $127,519/year — a difference of $26,098 (20.47%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Santa Rosa?

San Francisco magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73.86/hr while Santa Rosa hygienists earn $61.31/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Santa Rosa as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Santa Rosa. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $132,872, Santa Rosa = $112,749), job availability (420 vs 44 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in San Francisco vs Santa Rosa?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $100,388 in San Francisco and $90,995 in Santa Rosa. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov