MRI Technologist Pay

San Francisco vs Sunnyvale: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and Sunnyvale, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$153,617
$73.86/hr
Sunnyvale, CA
$190,215
$91.45/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CASunnyvale, CA
Median Salary$153,617$190,215
Hourly Rate$73.86$91.45
Entry Level (P10)$100,388$134,778
25th Percentile$106,500$158,618
75th Percentile$184,968$215,977
Top Earner (P90)$191,533$261,402
Total Employed42026
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($153,617) and Sunnyvale ($190,215) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.San FranciscoSunnyvaleMedian Salary$153,617$190,215Entry Level (P10)$100,388$134,778Top Earner (P90)$191,533$261,402US Median $100,283

Verdict

Sunnyvale, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to San Francisco.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Sunnyvale is $36,598 (23.82%). Sunnyvale's median is +89.68% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,145,Sunnyvale spans $126,624. Sunnyvale has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$100,388
P25$106,500
Median$153,617
P75$184,968
P90 (Top)$191,533
Sunnyvale
P10 (Entry)$134,778
P25$158,618
Median$190,215
P75$215,977
P90 (Top)$261,402

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Sunnyvale ($168,183 effective) pays 26.58% more than San Francisco ($132,872 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $153,617
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $132,872
Sunnyvale
Nominal: $190,215
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $168,183

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Larger job market (420 employed)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Sunnyvale if…

  • Higher median salary ($190,215/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($261,402)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $168,183)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 41.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 31.3% growth in Sunnyvale over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+41.6%

$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)

Sunnyvale, CA

+31.3%

$137,958 (2024) → $181,105 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: San Francisco or Sunnyvale?

Sunnyvale has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $190,215/year, compared to San Francisco at $153,617/year — a difference of $36,598 (23.82%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Sunnyvale?

San Francisco magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73.86/hr while Sunnyvale hygienists earn $91.45/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Sunnyvale as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Sunnyvale. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $132,872, Sunnyvale = $168,183), job availability (420 vs 26 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in San Francisco vs Sunnyvale?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $100,388 in San Francisco and $134,778 in Sunnyvale. The Sunnyvale area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov