MRI Technologist Pay

San Francisco vs Torrance: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between San Francisco, CA and Torrance, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

San Francisco, CA
$153,617
$73.86/hr
Torrance, CA
$131,488
$63.22/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSan Francisco, CATorrance, CA
Median Salary$153,617$131,488
Hourly Rate$73.86$63.22
Entry Level (P10)$100,388$89,257
25th Percentile$106,500$107,084
75th Percentile$184,968$151,744
Top Earner (P90)$191,533$184,817
Total Employed42026
Side-by-side bar chart comparing San Francisco ($153,617) and Torrance ($131,488) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.San FranciscoTorranceMedian Salary$153,617$131,488Entry Level (P10)$100,388$89,257Top Earner (P90)$191,533$184,817US Median $100,283

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 4 out of 4 metrics compared to Torrance.

The salary gap between San Francisco and Torrance is $22,129 (16.83%). San Francisco's median is +53.18% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in San Francisco spans $91,145,Torrance spans $95,560. Torrance has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$100,388
P25$106,500
Median$153,617
P75$184,968
P90 (Top)$191,533
Torrance
P10 (Entry)$89,257
P25$107,084
Median$131,488
P75$151,744
P90 (Top)$184,817

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($132,872 effective) pays 14.29% more than Torrance ($116,258 effective).

San Francisco
Nominal: $153,617
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $132,872
Torrance
Nominal: $131,488
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $116,258

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($153,617/year)
  • Better top-earner potential ($191,533)
  • Larger job market (420 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $132,872)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose Torrance if…

  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in San Francisco grew 41.6% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -7.8% growth in Torrance over the same period.

San Francisco, CA

+41.6%

$103,310 (2019) → $146,260 (2025)

Torrance, CA

+-7.8%

$135,747 (2024) → $125,191 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: San Francisco or Torrance?

San Francisco has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $153,617/year, compared to Torrance at $131,488/year — a difference of $22,129 (16.83%).

What is the hourly rate difference between San Francisco and Torrance?

San Francisco magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $73.86/hr while Torrance hygienists earn $63.22/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from San Francisco to Torrance as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing San Francisco and Torrance. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: San Francisco = $132,872, Torrance = $116,258), job availability (420 vs 26 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in San Francisco vs Torrance?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $100,388 in San Francisco and $89,257 in Torrance. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov