MRI Technologist Pay

Minneapolis vs Ramsey: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Salary (2026)

Compare magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries between Minneapolis, MN and Ramsey, MN. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Minneapolis, MN
$109,567
$52.67/hr
Ramsey, MN
$96,325
$46.31/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMinneapolis, MNRamsey, MN
Median Salary$109,567$96,325
Hourly Rate$52.67$46.31
Entry Level (P10)$94,926$68,783
25th Percentile$104,536$83,965
75th Percentile$113,180$108,242
Top Earner (P90)$117,445$128,128
Total Employed4307
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Minneapolis ($109,567) and Ramsey ($96,325) magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries.MinneapolisRamseyMedian Salary$109,567$96,325Entry Level (P10)$94,926$68,783Top Earner (P90)$117,445$128,128US Median $100,283

Verdict

Minneapolis, MN offers better overall compensation for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Ramsey.

The salary gap between Minneapolis and Ramsey is $13,242 (13.75%). Minneapolis's median is +9.26% compared to the US national median of $100,283.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Minneapolis spans $22,519,Ramsey spans $59,345. Ramsey has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced magnetic resonance imaging technologists.

Minneapolis
P10 (Entry)$94,926
P25$104,536
Median$109,567
P75$113,180
P90 (Top)$117,445
Ramsey
P10 (Entry)$68,783
P25$83,965
Median$96,325
P75$108,242
P90 (Top)$128,128

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Minneapolis ($104,527 effective) pays 6.89% more than Ramsey ($97,792 effective).

Minneapolis
Nominal: $109,567
CoL Index: 104.822
Adjusted: $104,527
Ramsey
Nominal: $96,325
CoL Index: 98.5
Adjusted: $97,792

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Minneapolis if…

  • Higher median salary ($109,567/year)
  • Larger job market (430 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $104,527)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Choose Ramsey if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($128,128)
  • You prefer the Minnesota area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, magnetic resonance imaging technologist salaries in Minneapolis grew 27.4% from 2019 to 2025, compared to 8.5% growth in Ramsey over the same period.

Minneapolis, MN

+27.4%

$81,860 (2019) → $104,320 (2025)

Ramsey, MN

+8.5%

$84,527 (2024) → $91,712 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays magnetic resonance imaging technologists more: Minneapolis or Ramsey?

Minneapolis has a higher median magnetic resonance imaging technologist salary at $109,567/year, compared to Ramsey at $96,325/year — a difference of $13,242 (13.75%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Minneapolis and Ramsey?

Minneapolis magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $52.67/hr while Ramsey hygienists earn $46.31/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Minneapolis to Ramsey as a magnetic resonance imaging technologist?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Minneapolis and Ramsey. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Minneapolis = $104,527, Ramsey = $97,792), job availability (430 vs 7 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn in Minneapolis vs Ramsey?

Entry-level (10th percentile) magnetic resonance imaging technologists earn $94,926 in Minneapolis and $68,783 in Ramsey. The Minneapolis area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

CT

Written by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR)

Career Analyst

Carmen has 10 years of experience as an MRI technologist. She specializes in pediatric imaging at a regional hospital. Carmen contributes to various industry publications.

Clinically reviewed by Jamal Patel, R.T. (R)(MR)Data verified by Li Chen, MS, R.T. (R)(MR)

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.03% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Carmen Torres, R.T. (R)(MR), a licensed magnetic resonance imaging technologist with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov